Points of Controversy
13.1. Of Age-Long Penalty
Controverted Point: That one doomed to age-long retribution must endure it for a whole aeon.
Theravādin: But this implies that the cycle may start when a Buddha is born into the world, or when the Saṅgha is dissolved, or when the condemned person is committing the act incurring the penalty, or when he is dying… .
It also implies that if he live for a past aeon, he may live for a future one—nay, for two, three, or four… .
And if during his aeon there be a cosmic conflagration, whither will he go?
Rājagirikas: To another plane of the universe.
Theravādin: Do the dead go thither? Do they go to the sky?
Rājagirikas: The dead go.
Theravādin: Can the act involving the penalty take effect in a subsequent life? You must deny… . Hence he must go to the sky. This implies that he has Psychic Power— else he could not. Now can one doomed to age-long retribution practise the four steps to Psychic Power—will, effort, thought, investigation?…
Rājagirikas: But if I am wrong, was it not said by the Exalted One:
“Doomed to the downfall, to hell for an aeon
Is the one who causes a schism in the Saṅgha.
Attached to division, intent on the unrighteous,
One falls away from the security from bondage.
Having split a Saṅgha in harmony,
One burns in hell for an aeon.”
Hence my proposition is true.